Skip to content
Home Comparisons
Compare SendSafely

SendSafely vs the alternatives.

Where SendSafely's split-key encryption architecture differs from Box, Egnyte, Kiteworks, Microsoft Purview, ShareFile, SharePoint, Tresorit, Virtru, and WeTransfer. Real product behavior, side by side.

Side-by-side comparisons

Pick a vendor to see how SendSafely compares.

Each page lays out where the products overlap, where SendSafely's architecture differs (split-key encryption, no admin path to plaintext, identity-verified recipients), and the use cases teams typically migrate.

Same controls, every comparison

SendSafely is built on the same architecture across every workflow.

Every file is encrypted on the sender's device using OpenPGP. SendSafely sees ciphertext only — the decryption key is split so nobody, not even SendSafely, can read the contents on its own.

Audited annually. SendSafely maintains the certifications regulated industries require.

Compliance & certifications
SOC 2 Type 2 HIPAA PCI DSS GDPR CCPA
Client-side OpenPGP
Files are encrypted on the device before they ever leave it.
Split-key architecture
The decryption key is split so no single party—including SendSafely—can decrypt file contents on its own.
Full audit trail
Every send, recipient open, identity check, and download is logged with timestamps for compliance reporting.
Talk to our team

Bring your toughest comparison.

We'll walk through SendSafely's architecture against the alternative you're evaluating. No slideware, no hand-waving — real product demo, real questions.